Hong Kong Makes its Move Regarding...

Steep rise in company litigation budgets

Is Necessity the Mother of Invention?

Pride & prejudice: arbitration-style

Litigation Funding: sit up and take...

Consumer Rights Act: implications for...

Justice not Profit: what does their...

Litigation funders: Consumer Rights Act...

Consumer Rights Act: Implications for...

Conflicts of interest, third party...

Civil Justice Council issues...

Good news for third party funders? CJC...

Third party funding and Security for...

Bias and Baggage

The US Chamber of Commerce gets it...

Vannin Capital expands into Australasia

Court fees could be on the rise again

L'arbitrage vu par les médias

Human Rights and Corporate...

Should indemnity costs be awarded where...

Litigation funding can be a 'win-win'

Should a negative inference be drawn on...

Focus on Litigation Funding

Hypothetically Speaking

Jetivia v Bilta – Review still needed...

Vannin Capital to Speak at ICC...

Litigation funding: an enabler for...

The Consumer Rights Act 2015: A UK...

The Rise of the East

Is your award bullet proof?

Less is more in litigation funding

French under-40 group has new co-chairs

It Pays to Insure

Vannin Capital to Present at CFA...

Third party funder hits back at court...

The funding market is maturing

Vannin Capital to Speak at Law Society...

Third-Party funder slams court fee...

New Court fee regime

An Arab Spring of treaty arbitration?

Vannin Capital to attend IBA Conference...

The costly killing of legitimate...

Funding in Focus

How to choose a litigation funder

Senior industry figure, John Kingston,...

Dispute resolution funding: why not?

'Slam-dunk' case no reason to refuse...